Home > Published Issues > 2026 > Volume 21, No. 1, 2026 >
JCM 2026 Vol.21(1): 20-34
Doi: 10.12720/jcm.21.1.20-34

Hybridization of Deep Learning Models for Multiclass Attack Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks

Omar Almomani1, Areen M. Arabiat2,*, Al-Ahmed Hind3, andEsraa Alsariera4
1Department of Networks and Cybersecurity, Faculty of Information Technology, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
2Department of Communications and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
3Faculty of Education, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Saudi Arabia
4Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
Email: o.almomani@ammanu.edu.jo (O.A.); a.arabiat@ammanu.edu (A.M.A.); hmaamad@imamu.edu.sa (A-A.H.); e.alsariera@ammanu.edu.jo (E.A.)
*Corresponding author

Manuscript received August 25, 2025; revised September 16, 2025; accepted September 23, 2025; published January 9, 2026.

Abstract—Flooding, blackhole, and forwarding are Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) attack types that have a severe impact on the reliability of the network and the integrity of data. This paper reports on a detailed benchmarking and hybridization analysis of seven deep learning models regarding multiclass intrusion detection on the WSNBFSF dataset. Comparison is made of the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and their mixtures, CNN-RNN, CNN-LSTM, and RNNLSTM. The same experimental conditions were used to train all the models and make the evaluation fair. The experimental findings are indicative of the fact that the ANN has the highest performance with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1−Score of 99.81% in split validation and 99.89% in 5- fold cross-validation, offering close to perfect discrimination of all attack types. The LSTM (98.27%) and RNN-LSTM (97.78%) memory augmented models also demonstrate a high ability to capture traffic time dependencies in WSNs, whereas the CNN-based models are efficient in spatial pattern extraction but slightly worse on fine-grained attack detection. Conversely, a standalone RNN has problems of vanishing gradients and thus gives an accuracy of 84.77 percent. In summary, the results provided serve as a pointer to architecture-specific strengths, and they provide important information in designing a scalable, real-time, and resource-efficient deep learning-based intrusion detection system with the peculiarities of WSN environments.

Keywords—wireless sensor networks, deep learning, flooding attack, blackhole attack, forwarding attack, WSNBFSF dataset

Cite: Omar Almomani, Areen M. Arabiat, Al-Ahmed Hind, and Esraa Alsariera, “Hybridization of Deep Learning Models for Multiclass Attack Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks," Journal of Communications, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20-34, 2026.

Copyright © 2026 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Article Metrics in Dimensions